Reddish Mucjs Before Period

Aratiri general law unless it is interpreted by the FA Uruguayan

Cesar Garcia Acosta

In law the origin of things becomes the reasoning on Act does Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologiae , pointing to this as "The ordinance of reason led to the common good and dictated by which is responsible for community care and solemnly promulgated" .

Nearer in time is referred to that law to the standard senior after the Constitution emanating from who holds the legislative power .

And that is why we have laws, like any formal act, certain defining features, and the law must comply with obvious principles, basic and inalienable:

The Principle of Generalitat : because the law includes those found in the conditions laid down by it, no exceptions whatsoever.

The Principle of the Obligation : because the law is mandatory attribute, ie one part establishes legal obligations or duties and other legal rights. This means that whenever there's a will instructing that subject, and one who obeys. The law imposes its terms, even against the will of its recipients. Its failure leads to a penalty, a punishment imposed by it.

The Principle of Permanence : because these are rules that are issued on an indefinite, permanent, for an indeterminate number of cases and facts, and only cease to have effect by its express derogaci '`on.

Elaborating on these concepts, we can also say that the laws are acts m aterials, and as such it is mandatory general rules that can only emanate from competent authority, admitting at the same time, Formal character because they arise from a parliament that was established constitutional mechanisms.

Finally we can add on the formalities of the law, which supports classification name "Fundamental" when it comes to rules establishing principles that should govern the laws of a country, as in the case the Constitution, which being the supreme law of law is above any law. Outside the constitutional two ranges are the following important note: the Law that is born as a consequence of a constitutional mandate to regulate a specific subject, and the ordinary law , among which include the budget law .

Above all this legal structure, which though formally a guarantee for the institutional Republican is the sovereign, society, the people, who account the difference of opinion or to highlight your initiative of direct democracy, which is another thing that we know as referendums or plebiscites that support the presentation of bills ratified laws or questioning.

If these are principles agreed technically, if this is the basis of social and political structure under a republican system we have come to the Uruguayans, what legal principles and aims to provide guarantees when processing the Frente Amplio with the current system ratified by the people and had the opportunity to prosecute and imprison active and retired military and even a former President?

Nothing new under the sun will not be returned Uruguay to the uncertainty of old disputes without meaning, which by the way, for being biased towards all those who committed crimes in the 60 and 70, seem to reach one side in litigation.

If to Amnesty is what is intended, must by the law of forfeiture, also drop the amnesty law for all those who attacked the Constitution , debiéndose review each case in particular.

And careful, because maybe even another President may fall into the judicial framework have violated the Constitution in times of democracy back 1969 to 1972.

other P &? Of "acid rain ."

These efforts will bring the country much more harm, than good and they are clearly unconstitutional (Article 47 on the preservation of the environment and water as a human right). 17,283 law for the protection of the environment states: "... sustainable development means development that meets present needs without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs "and later said that executive branch policy will " The distinction of Republic in the context of nations and Natural Country perspective economic, cultural and social sustainable development. " Therefore, projects are illegal dstos not be sustainable and also attempt to our brand identity to the world, the URUGUAY NATURAL.

P wavelets of various parties questioning the project

Senator Fernandez Huidobro (CAP / L, FA) said that an open field with projected dimensions "is already a problem in itself," and also "there are plenty of examples" in the world of environmental impacts caused by this activity ( The Daily , 14 / 3 / 11)

Rep. Luis Alberto Lacalle Pou (Smith, National Party) Chairman of the House of Reprentantes, said "We do not bring (in Uruguay) is an open pit mine. Certainly not! (Voices Weekly 3 / 3 / 2011.

Rep. VERRIER WALTER (We Uruguay, Partido Colorado) said that the mining project Aratirí prosper "is definitely cambia'ra and destroy the environment, as has occurred in other parts of the world '(p. We Uruguay Web, 15/12 / 2010).

In an outstanding brochure states: "IN THE 200 YEARS OF OUR NATION.

"I will not sell the rich heritage of the Eastern

the low price of the need "Jose Artigas"

Aratirí Actually this issue and planned reforms of the Mining Code, is to be vigilant, and have written several notes about it, but continue. hope that our legislators, as did the Deputy Verri, Department of Paysandu, speak out against this type of enterprise where all that matters is to get the iron, not giving any value added and make our country a "country to a country extractive productive." If you chose to continue the extraction of iron, it would be appropriate to achieve a "steel industry" XXI century material and not send him to China, India or other destinations for the benefit of international companies in question.